3. In the 2020 general election, a ballot proposition attempted to overturn Colorado's membership to the pact, but the measure failed, 52.3% to 47.7% in the referendum. Just 12 Closely Divided Battleground States Got 96% of 2020 Campaign Events. How about receiving a customized one? It happened once, in 1876. Although this may limit the amount of diversity that occurs in office, and may generate extra financial costs, the argument could be made that these risks outweigh the results of an election where a majority of states, not a majority of people, put someone into office. Lincoln Chafee (D) made his state the latest to sign on. More people live in urban regions, which means they would have a constant sway over the election. Constitutional Amendment to Guarantee the Right to Vote for All U.S. Citizens. Opines that the national popular vote plan is the wrong way to abolith the electoral college. The one-vote approach does not align with the way the electoral votes operates. 1, 2023 at 1:16 PM PST. 5. That structure makes it easier for extremist views to find official representation. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the president. There are logistical issues that are managed at the local level in each election. Every state is allocated several votes according to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation. Longley, Robert. Some critics argue that more people would vote in a direct popular election, according to the University of the Pacific. This divide creates natural divisions between groups of people who both support their country, but in different ways. It has its pros and cons though, many of which critics debate over. Advantage: Encourages Voter Turnout Many Americans are confused about how a win is obtained under these conditions and are on a quest to change this traditional statute. Here are the Cons of the Electoral College 1. In the 2020 election California did not certify their votes until Friday, December 11, only 3 days before the Electoral College met on Monday, December, 14. Cookies collect information about your preferences and your devices and are used to make the site work as you expect it to, to understand how you interact with the site, and to show advertisements that are targeted to your interests. (See: Electoral Votes by State). Mayors, governors, and senators are all elected by a simple majority. Because of the winner-take-all rule, a candidate can be elected president without winning the most popular votes nationwide. The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. Now, the states are considering the National Popular Vote plan, a system that, while not doing away with the Electoral College system, would modify it to ensure that the candidate winning the national popular vote is ultimately elected president. Under the current structure of the electoral college, the focus of a presidential campaign is on the so-called battleground states. 9. It is perhaps the most simplistic form of an election. The states would implement this plan once enough states controlling 270 electoral votes have signed on, guaranteeing that the national popular vote winner will win the presidency.. The official 2016 election results from the Electoral College gave Donald J. Trump the victory with 306 electoral votes v. Hillary Clinton's 232 votes. A candidate can win the popular vote in enough states to win a majority of electoral votes but still lose the popular vote nationally. Most recently, the bill was passed by a bipartisan 4016 vote in the Republican-controlled Arizona House, 2818 in Republican-controlled Oklahoma Senate, 574 in Republican-controlled New York Senate, and 3721 in Democratic-controlled Oregon House." Learn more about how the National Popular Vote compact works and the ways it could make our elections better for everyone. Start and finish your paper with ease. Inside Ohio or Florida, to pick two examples, the big cities do not receive all the attention, and they certainly do not control the outcome. That means every state is allowed a minimum of 3 electoral votes. As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath of the 2000 presidential election. Actually the NPV Compact doesnt change one word in he Constitution and in fact only changes state laws. cons of the national popular vote planchicago religious demographics. And unlike direct elections, either would provide an incentive for grass-roots activity, coalition building and enhanced citizen participation. But in practice it could happen every 10 or 20 years when the Electoral College votes change because the congressional boundaries change with the new population census. Proponents of the National Popular Vote fail to understand the most basic facts about the American presidential electoral system. All other votes cast for that candidate are therefore superfluous. N.p., n.d. Get breaking news and updates from Common Cause. Pros & Cons of a National Popular Vote Buy Complete Issue $19.95 Login or Subscribe The National Popular Vote How would the interstate compact work? Dont know what Ranked Choice Voting is? 1. Under the National Popular Vote plan,the compact would take effect only when enabling legislation has been enacted by states collectively possessing a majority of the electoral votes:270 of 538 total. E pluribus unum -- out of many, one. How Many Electoral Votes Does a Candidate Need to Win? That nightmare may seem like a pleasant dream if NPV has its way. Without the popular vote bill, swing states would continue to get more leverage and attention from candidates to ensure that they would be able to capture their votes. Longley, Robert. Proportional Plan As a result, an agreement between a group of states to cast all of their electoral votes in a similar manner, as proposed by the National Popular Vote plan passes constitutional muster. Over the long run the countrys popular vote in presidential elections has roughly been equally split between Republican and Democratic.*. National Popular Vote is a constitutional and practical way to implement nationwide popular election of the President a goal traditionally supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans. An individuals vote doesnt make a difference when it is counted against the votes of the delegates in the House of Representatives and Senate. Richards earned a master's degree at Carnegie Mellon University. After the 2016 presidential election, political science expert Nate Silver wrote that, since the swing states are not likely to support any plan that might reduce their influence over control of the White House, the National Popular Vote bill will not succeed unless the predominately Republican red states adopt it. The last amendment, the 27th Amendment to the Constitution, was ratified nearly 200 years after it was originally proposed. Each vote would affect each candidate instead of being overlooked due to which state those votes would be coming from. A direct popular election would make it more possible for third-party candidates to succeed and would also encourage political parties to become more radical and extreme. Unexpected emergencies would be difficult to handle. 1. Even if states impose fines on faithless electors for their actions, it is not a guarantee that the behavior will stop. The National Popular Vote bill will take effect when enacted into law by states possessing 270 electoral votes a majority of the current 538 electoral votes. It fails to reach the ideal of one-person one-vote. The bill has crossed paths with 36 legislative chambers and has been sponsored or voted for by 3,112 state legislators (National Popular Vote). A switch to the popular vote would eliminate the concept of a battleground state because the issue would be more on issues than states. In a direct popular election, a candidate could theoretically win without having broad support throughout the country. A simple change in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could fix the flaw and still provide the benefits of a popular election. amazon web services address herndon va custom airbrush spray tan near me custom airbrush spray tan near me Americans are still bent up and flustered on how an individual could lose the popular vote, but still, be given the upper hand in Electoral College votes. 622 By John Samples The National Popular Vote plan (NPV), introduced in more than 40 states, and adopted. Instead, each state and Washington D.C. is assigned a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. Common Cause The votes of those who do not live in closely divided battleground states effectively count less. NPV is more than a third of the way to its goal. In a closely contested direct popular election, every precinct across the country might require close examination, rather than a handful of states or precincts. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. It would eliminate the threat of a faithless elector. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Cons: Smaller states don't get as much of a say and people would demand a national recount National Bonus Plan Winner of popular vote gets extra 102 electoral votes Pros: No winner of popular vote losing overall Cons: Basically exactly like the Direct plan District Plan Win popular vote in each district, you get one electoral vote. The electoral college leads to a heavy emphasis on swing states and also typically over-represents citizens in rural states. 1. That's almost 1.5 billion . 1. This National Popular Vote Compact wouldn't take effect until states with 270 electors a majority joined in. By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. In U.S. history, the electoral college winner has failed to secure the popular vote 5 times. The use of the Electoral College has been the only approach the U.S. has used to gain a President, but this way has generated numerous issues. If the election is based off a popular vote, each of these areas would need to be closely examined in real-time, which would enhance the security of each vote that is cast. In Maine, both houses of the legislature passed the bill in 2019, but it failed at the final enactment step. The appeal of NPV is the simplicity of its message. The NPV Interstate Compact does not eliminate the very complicated Electoral College system that most voters dont really understand. Although faithless electors have not affected the results or outcome of an election yet, in 2016, there were 7 faithless electors. Robert Longley is a U.S. government and history expert with over 30 years of experience in municipal government and urban planning. 8. However, in the popular vote, Trump only received 62,984,825 votes against Hillary Clinton's 65,853,516 popular votes. Currently, candidates focus more on swing and battleground states to help them gain those electoral votes. Even the minority party wouldnt be encouraged to negotiate because they could simply stall until the next election. Part of HuffPost Politics. 3. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. Removing this system could encourage more people to come out to support their candidate. The electoral college encourages a two-party system and rewards candidates who have broad appeal. That is hardly a mandate for governing, though it would be taken as such. Advantages and Disadvantages of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact In the 2016 Presidential Election if the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact had been in effect the winner of the national popular vote, Hillary Clinton, would have become president instead of Donald Trump. In contrast, in a direct popular election, each vote matters equally. There are a number of pros for this method. If enacted by enough states, the National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Many cities and school districts, under threat of a lawsuit by a Malibu attorney, have already adopted or are in the process of changing to district elections rather than remaining citywide or . The National Popular Vote (NPV) refers to the concept of allocating a state's presidential electors to the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide regardless of the state results in a presidential election. Electing a president who did not have broad regional support could lead to a fractured and less cohesive country, according to the Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. In the 2016 election, "swing states" that might vote Republican or Democrat like Wisconsin were targets of candidates Donald J. Trump and Hillary R. Clinton. As of December 2020, the bill has been fully adopted predominately by Democratic-majority blue states which delivered the 14 largest vote shares for Barack Obama in the 2012 Presidential Election. To take effect, the National Popular Vote bill must be enacted by the state legislatures of states controlling a total of 270 electoral votes - a majority of the overall 538 electoral votes and the number currently required to elect a president. Cons of Electoral College. 2. cons of the national popular vote plan. Con:not Eliminate possibility that loser of the popular vote can still win the electoral vote The Proportional Plan A proposed reform where each presidential candidate would receive the percent of electoral votes that they win from each state Proportional Plan Pro:Possible for loser of popular vote to win presidency. Would you like to get a custom essay? However, many people believe that a direct popular election is more democratic and fair than the Electoral College. The principal flaw in the plan is its assumption that under the plan there will still be only two major parties competing for the presidency in 2020. . District Plan CONS Technically still possible, but A LOT hard to do so District 1 = Romney 57% District 2 = Romney 52% District 3 = Romney 70% Gerrymandering. In states with large population centers, individual voters have less power than voters in smaller states. It could help to reduce partisanship. According to Article II, Section 1, "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress." To pass an amendment to change the Constitution the Founding Fathers wisely required approval by 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 3/4 of the state legislatures instead of a simple majority. But if we set politics aside and focus on what is really best for democracy in our country in the long run I believe that the advantages of using the NPV compact to elect our president outweigh the disadvantages and the best way to elect our president in the 21st century is by direct popular vote using Ranked Choice Voting. Web. The discussion around using the popular vote for elections has increased since the results of the 2016 election. In 2016, Hillary Clinton had more than 10 million of these votes, while Donald Trump had more than 8.3 million, even though Trump won 30 states and Clinton won 20 and the District of Columbia. It could encourage voter turnout.
Ware Funeral Home Obituaries,
Kamienski Funeral Homes, Inc Obituaries,
Directions To Brigadier General Doyle Cemetery,
Mike Krzyzewski Height,
Articles C